Nature’s Remedy
It will come as no surprise to
readers of this column that we believe in Nature, in all its glories,
as a never ending source of inspiration, intellectual exploration and
deep spiritual satisfaction. We worry about urban sprawl and the
degradation of our public parks. We value co-existence with wildlife,
it’s natural habitat and try to tread softly, in our habits and
behavior so as to protect and preserve the natural environment.
Now comes some justification and
confirmation of what some of us have known all along: Exposure to
Nature, on a regular basis, enhances both physical and mental
well-being.
Emery University’s Rollins School of
Public Health scientist Howard Frumkin, M.D., presents the results of
his study in the April issue of the American Journal of Preventive
Medicine.
He points to a mass of evidence that
shows spending time in a natural environment may have positive health
effects and can help prevent and treat illnesses.
“Our standard clinical paradigm
involves medications more than non-medical approaches, treatment more
than prevention,” he says. “ But many people are intuitively
drawn to this idea [of spending time in nature] “ Dr. Frumkin
explains. “They feel restored and healthier in a beautiful
landscape.”
“And on the other side,” Frumkin
says, “ many environmentalists work to preserve nature for a range
of very good scientific reasons, but forget that one of the major
benefits may be human health.”
So, don’t be surprised when some day
soon, your doctor, psychotherapist or clergyperson suggests a hike, a
picnic in the park, or a walk on the beach.
Dr. Frumkin’s work on public health
aspects of natural environments is admittedly influenced by the work
of renowned Pulitzer Prize-winning author and Harvard scientist E.O.
Wilson, whose “biophilia” hypothesis claims that humans are
innately attracted to other living organisms and that this contact
with the natural world is both a primal instinct and benefits human
health.
Frumkin’s research points to evidence
of health benefits from four distinct interactions with the natural
environment: contact with animals, contact with plants, viewing
landscapes and contact with wilderness. Frumkin further asserts that
evolution may have hard-wired humans with a longing and preference
for specific natural settings
“Early humans found that places with
open views offered better opportunities to find food and avoid
predators,” Dr. Frumkin writes, “but they needed water to survive
and attack prey, and groups of trees for protection. Modern research
has shown that people today, given the choice, prefer landscapes that
look like this scenario.”
One wonders then, within the context of
the contentious public debate over urban sprawl, just who “owns”
a landscape? What long-term effect on the well-being of a community
may happen by cutting down trees and leveling the landscape to make
way for another strip mall?
Clearly psychologists, social workers
and health care practitioners have suspected for years that there is
a strong link between human health and exposure to the natural world.
A century ago, ocean cruises and summers in the mountains were
prescriptions for vague ailments only the rich could afford.
In modern times, pet therapy,
horticultural therapy, healing gardens, and New Age practices like
aromatherapy, stress reduction audio tapes of ocean waves other
sounds of nature are just a few example of attempts to reconnect with
our natural instincts. It’s no surprise that gardening is both the
most popular and fastest growing leisure activity in the U.S.
So, plant a garden, walk the dog,
stroll the nature trail. It does a body good.
(Originally published in Messenger-Post newspapers, April 1001)